VPN related organizational attacks and breaches are on the ascent, resulting in the adaptation of newer strategies for securing an organization’s networks and cloud systems. Consequently, two thirds of organizations worldwide are adopting something new; it is what is known as a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The idea of Zero Trust security has become widely popular over the last few years. While many organizations have shifted priorities to adapt zero trust, zero trust network access (ZTNA) is the technology behind achieving a true zero trust model.
What is ZTNA and why is it important? The Zero Trust Network security model is termed Never Trust, Always Verify. The ZTNA theory assumes that there will always be an attacker both inside and outside an organization’s network. No client or user ought to be consequently trusted, even if they bypass the DMZ. This straightforwardly differentiates the Trust and the Verify model of traditional perimeter security. Zero trust networks require verification whenever a client or user requests for access, whether or not the requester sits inside the organizational network. ZTNA does not depend on a DMZ edge comprising of VPNs, firewalls, edge servers, and other security devices protecting restricted resources.
There are many ways that ZTNA establishes a more secure access to organizational applications. ZTNA services establish an environment that safeguards both your physical (on-premises) and logical (cloud-based) resources. Applications are non-discoverable (covered up), and access is checked by a trust broker, who permits or denies access utilizing these three key advances:
Verify users when they sign on to the system.
Validate devices before entering the network for potential threats. Ensuring that devices that are incoming are known, trusted, and up to date on patches and security.
Limit access based on principle of least-privilege (PoLP). The user or device is only given as much privilege as needed to access the requested resource, based on roles of the user.
ZTNA provides advanced flexibility and scalability which enables organizations to access critical infrastructure without exposing services. Some core principles to how ZTNA works are as follow: Least-privilege access, which means only allowing access to the information each individual requires as mentioned above. This limits the ability of any malicious file to jump from one system to another and reduces the chances of internal data exfiltration.
Micro-segmentation divides up a network into segments with different access. This increases the means of the security and keeps attacker from running rampant through the network even if one segment is compromised. Data usage controls limit the actions of the user with data once they are provided access such as revoking permission to copy already-downloaded data to USB disk, email, or cloud apps.
Continuous monitoring observes how users are interacting with data and systems. This assists to verify that people really are who they claim to be and enables risk-management and security enforcements based on people’s actions.
There are several ZTNA use cases, but there are four common organizational use case. ZTNA provides a more secure cloud access. Securing multi-cloud access is the most famous spot for associations to begin their ZTNA journey. With more organizations receiving cloud, ZTNA can reduce third-party risk. Most outside users get over-privileged access which could become a threat. ZTNA fundamentally decreases third-party dangers by guaranteeing an outside user never gains access to the network and that only authorized users gain access to allowed applications.
ZTNA can accelerate M&A integration. ZTNA reduces and simplifies the time and management needed to ensure a successful M&A and provides immediate value to the business. And lastly, ZTNA is a more secure VPN alternative. For most organizations, VPNs are slow, many of which have poor security, and usually are difficult to manage.
There are two significant ZTNA architectures — Endpoint-initiated ZTNA and Service-initiated ZTNA. Endpoint-initiated ZTNA is portrayed by its use of an agent on users’ devices.
ZTNA Considerations
When choosing a ZTNA provider and technology, here are some questions an organization should consider:
Who has control of the access rules?
Where are our organizational secrets — like passwords and private keys kept?
How is the risk of internal threats alleviated?
Is the users’ data exposed or sold?
What is the scope of secure access? Does it include networks, users, etc.?
What is the ZTNA provider’s architecture? Are the servers located in the cloud or in a data center? Who can access it?
What happens if the ZTNA provider is compromised? Is the organization still secure?
For organizations that are interested in the Zero Trust Network Access functionality, it can be implemented within an organization in several separate ways. Gateway Integration is a way for ZTNA functionality which can be implemented as part of a network gateway as any traffic endeavoring to cross the network limit characterized by the gateway arrangement will be filtered based upon the access control policies. Secure SD-WAN executes advanced networking across the WAN, and Secure SD-WAN coordinates a security stack into every SD-WAN machine. ZTNA functionality can be fused into this security stack to give centralized access management. Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) takes the functions of Secure SD-WAN and has it as a virtual machine in the cloud. This empowers an organization to boost both network effectiveness and security, including ZTNA functionality.
So many would ask what are the benefits of ZTNA? Here are some strengths of ZTNA, first, less vulnerability. Once set up, the ZTNA better secures the organization, particularly from in-network lateral dangers that could easily be manifested shown under a different security model. Secondly, there is a strong policy for user identification and access. Zero Trust requires solid administration of users inside the network, so that their records are safer, making the whole network securer. Utilizing multi-factor authentication or in any event, moving beyond passwords with biometrics is a decent method to keep accounts protected.
Then, with the order of clients, they must be given access to information and accounts as essential for their specific work. Third, smart segmentation of data. In a ZTNA, you would not give access to all the information to the clients. Segmenting information as per type, sensitivity and use which gives a safer arrangement. As a result, critical or sensitive data is secured, and potential attack surfaces are reduced. Increased data protection. ZTNA also keeps data secure in both storage and transit like automated backups and encrypted or hashed message transmission. Lastly, ZTNA is a good security orchestration. This is the errand of ensuring all your security components work efficiently and viably. In an ideal ZTNA, no openings are left uncovered, and the joined components complement one another rather than presenting incongruities between them.
There are still some challenges to using the Zero Trust Model. With so many extra security classifications, the ZTNA makes a security strategy more complicated. Here are a portion of the extra difficulties that come with such a comprehensive strategy. Time and effort to set up. Reorganizing strategies inside a current network can be troublesome because it needs to work during the changes. Moreover, it might be easier to create another network from scratch and afterward switch over to a new one. If legacy systems are contradictory with the ZTNA structure, starting from scratch will be necessary. Increased management of varied users. Employee users need to be monitored more closely with access only granted, as necessary. And users can go beyond employees. Customers, clients, and third-party vendors may also use the company’s website or access data. This means there is a wide variety of access points, and a ZTNA requires specific policies for each type of group.
More devices to manage. The present workplace incorporates several types of users, as well as various devices for every one of them. These various devices may have their own properties and communication protocols which should be monitored and secured specifically to their sort. More complicated application management. Moreover, there has been an increase in business applications. Applications are often cloud-based with use across different platforms, and they might be shared to outside users. In accordance with a ZTNA mindset, application use ought to be arranged, checked, and tailored specifically to users’ needs. More careful data security. These days there is more than one area where data can be stored, which implies there are more sites to secure. Data configuration should be done capably with the most elevated security principles.
In conclusion, there are a couple of key takeaways for the Zero Trust Network Access. The idea of zero trust network access (ZTNA) was put forward in 2010 by John Kindervag, who at the time was a VP and head investigator at Forrester Research. The frequently utilized phrase used to describe the ZTNA approach is, “Never trust, always verify.” The ZTNA is a blend of the guideline of least privilege, software-defined perimeters, and advanced security tools and strategies. There are two main ZTNA architectures: endpoint-initiated and service-initiated. Endpoint-initiated ZTNAs use a user agent while service-initiated ZTNAs use the cloud.
#ztna #cybersecurity #zerotrust